Like this blog on facebook

Showing posts with label Activism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Activism. Show all posts

Thursday, 24 May 2012

Understanding The Madness


According to the 2011 census of India the number of females per 1000 male in our country is 940. This is unfortunate, yet one may find prospect in the fact that this is not a fall but 7 point rise when compared to the census of the previous decade. I for once saw hope in the news but that was until I went beyond the headline. There is one fact stated in the census report which must be heeded to and that is that the number of female children per male child fell drastically through this decade.

Why is it, one wonders, that there is such inequality in our society.  Why is it that after fighting successfully with foreign rulers for centuries we are falling to malice that our own culture has acquired for itself. Why is it that in today’s world of equality we are still obsessed with the desire for a male child? How can a woman who has felt her offspring in her womb get rid of her upon knowing that she is a girl? How indeed. Let us explore for their purposes.

A desire for son is innate to most sections of our society. It is a will that many people openly express. It is so commonly accepted that in a recent case a judge was reported saying that it is acceptable.  The reason being that in most parts of our country a patriarchal system of inheritance is followed where only sons retain the property and the name of their father. There are a few exceptions of course but none in significant majority. Therefore preference to a male child seems like a strategy for preserving the family name.

The social setup in India is such that it is a son who has the responsibility of his parents in their old age. The idea of living with a daughter and her in-laws is simply too imprudent to even consider for most parents. With income as limited as it is in our country saving for retirement is mostly not an option. For this reason most people who are unable to produce a male heir are either forced to work through their old age or to compete for old-age homes. A male child thus is a retirement plan and a daughter simply doesn't fit.

In our country where most people still live below the poverty line, children are often no more than an economic choice. A son can earn his share of bread and more from early days of his life whereas after a certain age daughters, who are not allowed to work because of backward conservative mindset of parents, are commonly accepted as burdens. Thus for many in our society having a girl child is an economic disincentive.

The most important among these factors perhaps is a curse from our past that still haunts millions of women through their life and through them their parents. Yes dowry, the socially accepted form of human trade in our culture, is perhaps the most unforgiving of all the reasons. It is because of this that many families kill their newborn or unborn daughters in fear of the grave financial misfortunes that her marriage would bring along. Whereas a son simply by his marriage can pay a lot of bills and thus the greed makes them covet.

Upon observation we find that there is some rationale in the unjust preference of a son over a daughter. There is some logic, no matter how horrid, behind the gruesome murder of a daughter. And thus there is a plausible reason behind the falling child sex ratio. There is no doubt that the number 914 to 1000 is a taint on the values of the nation. We need to rise and work towards an unbiased future because such an imbalance as this is dangerous for the country.

There are laws in India that were intended to rid us of these evils. There are laws, no matter how lax, that were intended to stop foeticide. There are also laws that were intended to stop the practice of dowry. But the thing worth marking is that there seems to be a lack of will among the administrators and police for implement such laws. This is because they too are a part of this biased society that has dual standards for the sexes. For them to change we the society have to change.

We must remember not to separate the cause from the consequence. Working towards stopping female foeticide would be unfruitful if we do not work towards eradicating the causes behind it. We must first work towards stopping the practice of dowry so that then we can work towards equality. For without equality we can only check the nuisance but we can never stop it. It is only through impartiality between the two halves of the nation that harmony can be achieved.


Further reading :
Dowry laws in India
Satyamev Jayate episode that features foeticide

Sunday, 8 April 2012

A Hole In The System

Anna Hazare
When Anna Hazare started his agitation against corruption for the formation of the Jan Lokpal Bill I became a supporter of his movement. In a country that has lost more to corruption than to war it seemed like a very sound initiative. But it was not until the government’s proposal of the bill and the debate over it that I truly realized what was at stake and it is way more than getting some stray politicians into jail, it is a battle for India’s soul.

Let me begin my post with what I believe about systems. Firstly any system must be strong and efficient in order to perform its intended job. Secondly, any system that involves humans has a potential for corruption. And thirdly, any system that has been corrupted must be brought down. Hence all administrative system as per my belief has a fraction of corrupt in them, thus no system must have supreme authority so that the corrupt in them can be brought down.

When our people and media reflect on the idea of Lokpal they seem to hold an image of Nehru capped Gandhians who would never do wrong. They seem to forget that when Lokpal becomes a constitutional body it is bound to outlive Anna Ji, Kiran Ji and the even the youngest of Indian children born today. They seem to forget that other than being a setup for bringing down corruption Lokpal itself is an administrative system constituted by humans.

Complete power can thus never be given to Lokpal no matter how much Anna Ji and his humble hearted followers call for it. Just think about it, Anna’s idea of Lokpal seems to be that of a body which has the power to investigate by undertaking CBI and the power to prosecute in a court of law that itself is answerable to Lokpal. In such a situation can any decision ever go against that of Lokpal when the Judiciary itself is its under pressure?

As if to make the image even more horrific the team intends to put the most important of India’s offices under the ambit of Lokpal, the Office of the Prime Minister of India! As if the judicial encroachment into Legislative turf was not enough, you now intend to put the PMO under the whims of an all powerful potential monster. This never fails to remind me of how the Titans were brought down by their sons.

I felt sad when I saw our political parties reel under the pressure of the misinformed populace. Anna is a patriot but does he hold enough wisdom to choose what is right for the future of the country. And even if that were true last time I checked India was a democracy not mobocracy or monocracy. It is true that we need a Lokpal and that it needs to be strong but it must be answerable to somebody.

There can never be a single answer to this call for a corruption free society and existence of bodies like Lokpal is essential. But creating a single body that has all the power and responsibility to tackle corruption would be like creating a Kraken. Every system must have a hole. And our government must make one by creating different powerful bodies to tackle corruption at different levels. We must remember that a fight against corruption is a never ending one and no harsh steps must be taken which may jeopardize the state of the nation.

Further reading: 

Saturday, 24 March 2012

The Environmental Hypocrisy


The reactor plant under construction at Kudankulam
Do you know without whom the world would be better? My answer to this question would be environmental activists. These peculiar breed of humans do not believe in letting the system work. Though they often work for environmental causes but most of the time their work is not inspired by belief in cause rather is a search for importance in a world which can run perfectly well without them. Their plan of action consists of finding anything worth protesting on and then misleading the innocent to join their madness. I am frustrated by their acts of hypocrisy especially when it comes down to energy.

These activists are the people who fill in our books with environmental need for non exhaustible resources; they tell us how the potential of our Himalayan Rivers are yet to be tapped. Then the go and start the Tehri dam agitation, the Narmada bachao movement, and the Save Ganga campaigns. I do believe that they are justified in their fears about the environmental costs of the projects and the resettlement of people but is it something that should come at the cost of national development?

Yes wildlife was lost when Tehri dam was constructed but then read about Itaipu and find out how little is the loss when compared to the Brazilian project. Still not ready to bear the environmental cost? All right maybe we will switch to some other form of energy with less environmental impact. Well I think even the government would agree... but hey do the activists agree? News flash: no they don’t and we have a Kudankulam at hand. This time they protest over the risk of an accident, a Fukushima or Chernobyl!

Protesters outside the Kudankulam project site
Now I would like to ask them should we stop building sky scrapers just because they may fall in a massive theoretically possible earthquake. If that be the case let us build huts in the future. Now we can’t even do that can we? Otherwise they will call us slum dwellers and cite India as poor. They always tend to argue that there are  alternatives but when you go for the alternative you end up with them citing another problem. I think I’ll mention all the energy resources and the problems they associate with them.


Resources                   Problems

Hydro power            Loss of wildlife, displacement of mass population, safety of dams.
Thermal power         Air pollution, depletion of coal, health issues.
Nuclear power          Nuclear safety, waste disposal problems.
Wind energy            Now this one is interesting. Apparently looking at the shadow cast by the fan of a windmill for a long time can drive people crazy. The bird and bat death, and a mysterious health problems termed wind-turbine syndrome also occur due to windmills.
Solar energy            Solar panels consist of toxic materials, electronic waste disposal problems, not to mention the huge cost-efficiency deficit.
Geothermal energy    As of now not sufficient to run a country. Also the technology is still far away in a land not known to man.
Tidal energy             Anchors destroy ocean bed ecosystems, disrupt fish migration routes, also there are limited places to install such projects.
Bio-gas                   Methane is a very high grade green house gas. There are safety concerns and limited production issues and if you are seriously thinking of running industries on bio-gas then imagine the number of cattle required to generate so much of feces.

Conclusion: If environmentalists had their way we would be living in dark ages. I understand all your concerns but you need to understand mine. We have to get rid of our dependence on coal and we need hydro electricity and nuclear electricity to fill in the gap. Then we may phase in other forms of energy production once problems related with them are sorted out. Even the microphones that you use to shout slogans against the government require electricity (not to mention they cause noise pollution). So either live in a house without any electric appliances or stop misleading the people and cut the crap!

Please do not mind the informal use of language.

Further reading: